lily alssen.
  • bio.
  • say hi.
  • ig.
  • shop.
  • instagram
  • shop
  • bio.
  • say hi.
  • ig.
  • shop.

WEEK 14: SUPERVISOR SESSION


Preparation

INTRODUCTION

Video (both voices)

Password: reviewC

Alternative Video (female voice with steps)

Alternative Video (only steps)

STATEMENT (2nd version)

ISO-SPECTIVE is a series of photographs examining the notion/concept of isolation.

By contrasting interiority with exteriority, the overarching theme of loneliness in the present arises. Indulging in past memories and observing the outward facing self-representation in times when communication happens predominantly via technology, the question emerges if this unconsciously leads to the loss of one’s own reality.

The series is informed by the writers Ollivier Dynes, Gaston Bachelard and Erving Goffman, whereas some of the pieces are influenced by Sophie Calle’s Les Dormeurs.

SELECTION

no horizon
no horizon
mom, i’m fine
mom, i’m fine
smoke and mirrors
smoke and mirrors
just the two of us
just the two of us
_LIL1885
_LIL1885
_LIL2525
_LIL2525
_LIL2392_crop
_LIL2392_crop
_LIL2092
_LIL2092
Video 31-5-20, 13 50 37
Video 31-5-20, 13 50 37

Feedback

Statement is good now. It's short but if I add anything more, I'd only go in circles.

Selection is good, only GIF is too small, gotta recheck that.

It’s not necessary to show an exhibit space as my work is not meant to be shown in a gallery. As I see it rather as an editorial, it’s totally sufficient to show the images on a website.

Introduction is … interesting. Shane suggest I should go with it and see how the reactions are. As I have worked so intensively on the video and the voices, I can’t judge anymore if it’s good or super cheesy or embarrassing. Before talking to Shane, I asked 2 other people for their opinion and both recommended I shouldn’t use it. That's why I made 2 alternative Versions (see above) but they are a bit boring.

Also a few days later, I still can't decide, so I'll keep track of the score and made a pros and cons list.

PROS (score: III)

I’m quite excited that the two voices work that well together. It’s absolutely possible to focus on one of them. I like the length and find that it’s not too boring. The rhythm is nice and the moving image also adds nicely to the selection.

CONS (score: III)

The voices are horrible. She sounds like an old grade school teacher (but reads nicely) and he is so full of his “sexy” (not really) voice that he completely ignores what the poem is about (which kinda adds to my small topic on the side: of lost in translation). Feedback from my German friend was, that the voices superimpose (?) my work and make it look bad. Also, in Germany managers apparently name this poem as their favorite poetry (very weird). The second person I asked simply stated that it’s just weird. I’m ok with that. I’m only afraid that it’s embarrassing.

I will decide at a later point if I’ll go with it or not. At this point, keeping track of the score is rather fun than really influencing me. As the opinions are spread quite equally, it's anyway my decision.

PREV WEEK 13: SUPERVISOR SESSION
NEXT WEEK 14: REVIEW C
  • This is my process journal for my semester project at RMIT Masters of Photography.

    Have fun scrolling through my mind.

  • back to overview

    • process journal
    • soliloquy
    • iso-spective
    • infinity mirror [pt1]
    • infinity mirror
    • infinity mirror [b side]
    • infinity mirror [exegesis]
    • zwischenspiel / interlude
    • imprint
    • privacy policy
    • infinity mirror [b side] @ bahnwärter thiel [DE]
    • infinity mirror [b side] @ bahnwärter thiel
  • categories

    • semester 1 (46)
      • group crit (semester 1) (2)
      • online dossier (semester 1) (27)
      • proposal (semester 1) (1)
      • review (semester 1) (3)
      • supervision (semester 1) (13)
    • semester 2 (47)
      • ground for thoughts (semester 2) (2)
      • group crit (semester 2) (2)
      • online dossier (semester 2) (26)
      • progress (semester 2) (3)
      • proposal (semester 2) (1)
      • review (semester 2) (2)
      • supervision (semester 2) (15)
    • semester 3 (33)
      • ground for thoughts (semester 3) (1)
      • group crit (semester 3) (2)
      • online dossier (semester 3) (15)
      • project page (semester 3) (3)
      • proposal (semester 3) (1)
      • supervision (semester 3) (12)
    • semester 4 (47)
      • ground for thoughts (semester 4) (4)
      • group crit (semester 4) (4)
      • online dossier (semester 4) (18)
      • project page (semester 4) (3)
      • supervision (semester 4) (18)
  • recent posts

    • WEEK 17: TEST INSTALLATION
    • PROJECT PAGE: MICHELLE
    • PROJECT PAGE: QI
    • PROJECT PAGE: NIKOLA
    • WEEK 16: SUPERVISOR SESSION (W/ SHANE)
    • WEEK 15: SUPERVISOR SESSION (W/ SHANE)
    • WEEK 14: SUPERVISOR SESSION (W/ SHANE)
    • WEEK 13: SUPERVISOR SESSION (W/ SHANE)
    • WEEK 12: SUPERVISOR SESSION 2 (W/ SHANE)
    • WEEK 12: SUPERVISOR SESSION (W/ SHANE)
    • WEEK 11: SUPERVISOR SESSION (W/ SHANE)
    • WEEK 10: GROUP CRIT III
    • ONLINE DOSSIER: JOHN SULER AND RICHARD ZAKIA »PERCEPTION AND IMAGING: PHOTOGRAPHY AS A WAY OF SEEING«
    • WEEK 10: SUPERVISOR SESSION (W/ SHANE)
    • ONLINE DOSSIER: ERWIN WURM
    • WEEK 9: SUPERVISOR SESSION (W/ SHANE)
    • WEEK 8: GROUND FOR THOUGHTS (W/ ADELE VARCOE)
    • WEEK 8: SUPERVISOR SESSION (W/ SHANE)
    • ONLINE DOSSIER: CLARK MOUSTAKAS »HEURISTIC RESEARCH: DESIGN, METHODOLOGY, AND APPLICATIONS«
    • ONLINE DOSSIER: LECTURE TOOLS FOR CREATIVE RESEARCH BY SALLY MANNALL »HEURISTIC METHODOLOGY«
    • ONLINE DOSSIER: VERA JOHN-STEINER »CREATIVE COLLABORATION«
    • ONLINE DOSSIER: YVA
    • ONLINE DOSSIER: GERO VON BOEHM »HELMUT NEWTON – THE BAD AND THE BEAUTIFUL«
    • WEEK 7: GROUP CRIT II
    • WEEK 7: SUPERVISOR SESSION (W/ DAVID)
copyright lily alssen. 2025
imprint privacy policy
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
OK More Info